Supriya Sule Slams Maharashtra Government's Urban Naxalism Bill!
Compares proposed anti-urban Naxal bill to Rowlatt Act
In a scathing critique, Nationalist Congress Party (NCP) MP Supriya Sule has condemned the Maharashtra government's proposed Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill 2024, aimed at tackling urban Naxalism. This exhaustive report delves into the details of the controversy surrounding the bill.
"A Threat to Democracy": Supriya Sule
Sule alleged that the bill would undermine people's fundamental rights, including their right to free speech and peaceful protests. She drew parallels between this bill and the colonial-era Rowlatt Act, used by the British to suppress opposition.
Key Concerns:
- Arbitrary Powers: Excessive powers granted to the administration, which could be misused to harass individuals or organizations that express dissenting opinions.
- Non-Bailable Offenses: Cases registered under this bill will be non-bailable, which could lead to unfair detention and suppression of opposition voices.
- Restrictions on Free Speech: Curbs on free speech and peaceful protests, which are essential components of a healthy democracy.
Background of the Bill
The Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill 2024 was introduced by the Maharashtra government to tackle urban Naxalism. The bill aims to provide a legal framework for the state to deal with Naxalite activities, which have been on the rise in recent years.
Reactions from Other Parties
The bill has received mixed reactions from other political parties. While some parties have supported the bill, citing the need to tackle Naxalism, others have opposed it, arguing that it would give excessive powers to the administration.
Next Steps
The bill will undergo further scrutiny by a joint select committee before its reintroduction in the state legislature's monsoon session in July 2025. The committee will examine the bill in detail and make recommendations for amendments, if necessary.
Conclusion
The Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill 2024 has sparked a heated debate in the state, with some parties supporting it and others opposing it. While the bill aims to tackle urban Naxalism, its critics argue that it would undermine people's fundamental rights. As the bill undergoes further scrutiny, it remains to be seen whether it will be passed in its current form or undergo significant amendments.
000
Comment List